charles forerunner 3fpxt37x6uq unsplash(1)

Running AMCs with the Discipline of a Fund Structure

Over the last few years I have spent a great deal of time both structuring Actively Managed Certificates (AMCs) and being involved in the running of UCITS funds.  One observation keeps returning to me: the most robust way to set up and run an AMC is to apply many of the same principles that govern a UCITS fund.

In other words, it helps to think with a UCITS hat on when structuring an AMC.

AMCs are often viewed purely as structured products, with the appealing ability to be launched rapidly, designed flexibly, and distributed efficiently.  While these characteristics are valuable, they can sometimes lead to an overly “trading-led” mindset rather than an “asset management” mindset.

In my view, the best AMCs are run by applying the principles borrowed from the funds world.

The UCITS framework has, over decades, developed a set of disciplines that protect investors and improve the quality of the portfolio management.  These include, among others:

  • Independent oversight
  • Transparency of valuation
  • Robust risk management processes
  • Separation of roles such as administration and custody
  • Overarching product governance
  • Clarity on costs and investor value

While an AMC does not sit inside the UCITS regulatory framework, there is no reason why many of these principles cannot be voluntarily adopted.

At Gilderstone Securities, when we think about the design of securitisation vehicles used to issue AMCs, we think carefully about how to replicate the operational robustness typically associated with fund structures.  This means focusing on areas such as:

  • Independent NAV calculation and administration
  • Clear governance and defined responsibilities
  • Robust risk monitoring and portfolio transparency
  • Institutional-grade service providers
  • A structure that investors can understand and trust

In other words, the aim is to combine the flexibility of a securitisation-issued AMC with the discipline of a traditional fund structure.

For asset managers and investors alike, this approach offers a compelling middle ground. AMCs can provide speed, efficiency and strategy flexibility, while fund-style governance can provide the operational credibility that institutional investors increasingly expect.

As the AMC market continues to grow, I believe the managers who succeed will be those who treat these products not simply as structured notes, but as properly governed investment vehicles.

Applying UCITS-style thinking to AMC structures is, in my opinion, a natural evolution for the market.

At Gilderstone Securities we are fortunate to have the experience and expertise required to apply these principles when structuring AMCs.  Please get in touch and discuss with us how we can structure your next AMC knowing you’ll receive the governance and operational robustness that it deserves.

The information contained on this website is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer, solicitation, or recommendation to acquire or dispose of any investment, security, or financial instrument, nor does it constitute financial, investment, legal, tax, or accounting advice.

Gilderstone's services are intended for professional and institutional clients only. Any structuring, issuance, or securitisation activity described herein is conducted on a private placement basis only and is not intended to constitute a public offering of securities in any jurisdiction.

Such activities are subject to applicable regulatory requirements and may not be available in all jurisdictions. In particular, the information on this website is not directed at, and the services described herein are not available to, US persons or residents within the meaning of the US Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the US Investment Advisers Act of 1940. Nothing on this website constitutes an offer or solicitation of securities or investment advisory services in the United States or to US persons.

Past performance is not indicative of future results. Recipients should conduct their own due diligence and seek independent professional advice including legal, tax, accounting, and financial guidance before making any investment or structuring decisions.

Gilderstone accepts no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the information contained on this website.